How is reasonable suspicion defined?

Reasonable suspicion is defined as the belief that a law enforcement officer has, based on specific and articulable facts, that criminal activity may be afoot. This standard requires more than a vague hunch or mere intuition; it is grounded in observable behavior or evidence that suggests that a crime might be taking place or about to take place.

The concept of reasonable suspicion emphasizes the need for officers to have a factual basis for their suspicion, such as unusual behavior, specific circumstances, or relevant information that would lead a reasonable person to believe criminal activity is likely. This sets it apart from mere feelings or beliefs that lack a concrete basis in observable actions or prior knowledge.

The other options do not align with the legal standard of reasonable suspicion. For instance, feelings or emotions do not provide a solid foundation for suspicion. Outdated training would not yield relevant or actionable information in current contexts. Proof of a crime in progress, on the other hand, is a higher standard known as probable cause, which is different from the lower threshold established by reasonable suspicion.